Quick Facts
Course duration
1 hour
PD hours count
1.5 points
Course type
Seminar
Date
13.08.2025
Format
Online and offline
Language
Russian
Speaker
Cost of the seminar

Free 〒
For PONEN members

Free 〒
For non-members of PONEN
Objectives of the seminar
Expand the understanding of the risks of the standard approach and show where the designer loses money
The seminar reveals the limitations of traditional design according to SP: why tabular values are not specific, but an average approach that does not take into account the features of a specific site. Participants will learn what they lose by relying solely on the results of "basic" surveys, and how this affects the cost, safety and timing of the project. Analysis of errors in real cases will show how the standard path leads to overspending of materials, overestimation of depth and excessive reinforcement.
Venue of the seminar: Almaty, Satbayev University, auditorium 113 GUK.
The seminar reveals the limitations of traditional design according to SP: why tabular values are not specific, but an average approach that does not take into account the features of a specific site. Participants will learn what they lose by relying solely on the results of "basic" surveys, and how this affects the cost, safety and timing of the project. Analysis of errors in real cases will show how the standard path leads to overspending of materials, overestimation of depth and excessive reinforcement.
Venue of the seminar: Almaty, Satbayev University, auditorium 113 GUK.
Show the advantages of geotechnical modeling and teach how to apply it in practice
Using the example of the 240 MW CHP project, participants will see how modern methods (CPT, SPT, MASW, Plaxis modeling) allow taking into account real data, geological features, seismicity and neighboring buildings. Analysis of the modeling stages will help to understand which parameters are critical, how to collect them, and how to interact with the survey team. It will also be shown how to correctly include modeling in the TOR for the IG, and why this approach facilitates the examination, reduces the risk of cost overruns and makes the designer's work more manageable and predictable.
Using the example of the 240 MW CHP project, participants will see how modern methods (CPT, SPT, MASW, Plaxis modeling) allow taking into account real data, geological features, seismicity and neighboring buildings. Analysis of the modeling stages will help to understand which parameters are critical, how to collect them, and how to interact with the survey team. It will also be shown how to correctly include modeling in the TOR for the IG, and why this approach facilitates the examination, reduces the risk of cost overruns and makes the designer's work more manageable and predictable.
Fill out the form to register for PONEN courses



